Dua Lelaki Dipenjara 14 Hari, Denda RM8,000 Palsukan Sijil Cuti Sakit
Dua Lelaki Dipenjara 14 Hari, Denda RM8,000 Palsukan Sijil Cuti Sakit nuramira_che-a… Wed, 12 Aug 2026 - 22:24 Mahkamah Majistret Kuantan memerintahkan dua lelaki masing-masing dipenjara 14 hari dan denda RM8,000 selepas mengaku bersalah atas tuduhan memalsukan 40 sijil cuti sakit dari Mac hingga Julai lepas. Majistret Ellyna Othman juga memerintahkan Mohd Shukrie Zainuddin, 28, dan Muhammad Asyraf Zunaidy, 31, dipenjara lapan bulan jika gagal menjelaskan denda. Mohd Shukrie dan Muhammad Asyraf didakwa secara tidak jujur membuat dokumen palsu, iaitu 40 sijil cuti sakit sebuah klinik dan menggunakan nama serta tandatangan seorang doktor dengan niat menipu di sebuah kilang di Jalan Pintasan Gebeng, di sini antara 28 Mac hingga 13 Julai. Pertuduhan dibuat mengikut Seksyen 465 Kanun Keseksaan yang dibaca bersama dengan Seksyen 34 kanun sama yang memperuntukkan hukuman penjara tidak lebih dua tahun atau denda atau kedua-duanya, jika sabit kesalahan. Timbalan Pendakwa Raya B. Deevagaran Naidu memohon hukuman setimpal terhadap mereka kerana telah mengeluarkan sijil cuti sakit palsu dengan menggunakan nama klinik serta doktor yang bertauliah. Peguam Muhammad Hakimie Ali daripada Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan (YBGK) merayu dua lelaki itu hanya dikenakan hukuman denda kerana telah insaf dan berjanji tidak akan mengulangi kesalahan itu. Sumber: Awani menerusi Bernama Disable Ads Off Brand Safe On Mahkamah Majistret Kuantan memerintahkan dua lelaki masing-masing dipenjara 14 hari dan denda RM8,000 selepas mengaku bersalah atas tuduhan memalsukan 40 sijil cuti sakit dari Mac hingga Julai lepas. Majistret Ellyna Othman juga memerintahkan Mohd Shukrie Zainuddin, 28, dan Muhammad Asyraf Zunaidy, 31, dipenjara lapan bulan jika gagal menjelaskan denda. Mohd Shukrie dan Muhammad Asyraf didakwa secara tidak jujur membuat dokumen palsu, iaitu 40 sijil cuti sakit sebuah klinik dan menggunakan nama serta tandatangan seorang doktor dengan niat menipu di sebuah kilang di Jalan Pintasan Gebeng, di sini antara 28 Mac hingga 13 Julai. Pertuduhan dibuat mengikut Seksyen 465 Kanun Keseksaan yang dibaca bersama dengan Seksyen 34 kanun sama yang memperuntukkan hukuman penjara tidak lebih dua tahun atau denda atau kedua-duanya, jika sabit kesalahan. Timbalan Pendakwa Raya B. Deevagaran Naidu memohon hukuman setimpal terhadap mereka kerana telah mengeluarkan sijil cuti sakit palsu dengan menggunakan nama klinik serta doktor yang bertauliah. Peguam Muhammad Hakimie Ali daripada Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan (YBGK) merayu dua lelaki itu hanya dikenakan hukuman denda kerana telah insaf dan berjanji tidak akan mengulangi kesalahan itu. Sumber: Awani menerusi Bernama Main Image Image Disable Ads Off Brand Safe On Sub Category Berita Google analytics counter 0 Author name override Awani AI Generated Summary Dua lelaki dipenjara 14 hari dan didenda RM8,000 selepas mengaku bersalah memalsukan 40 sijil cuti sakit dari Mac hingga Julai lalu. Mereka menggunakan nama dan tandatangan seorang doktor tanpa kebenaran untuk menipu di sebuah kilang di Jalan Pintasan Gebeng. Jika gagal bayar denda, mereka akan menjalani hukuman penjara selama lapan bulan mengikut Seksyen 465 Kanun Keseksaan. Enable AI Generated Summary Enable Product Tags Hair Care Enable Product Slider Enable
Source: Astro Mustika HD · August 12, 2026 at 8:43 PM · AI-assisted report
KUALA LUMPUR, 13 AUGUST 2026 —
Listen to this article
DomainFork Audio · read aloud
**Two Men Jailed 14 Days, Fined RM8,000 for Forging Sick Leave Certificates**
Market Impact
KUANTAN, Aug 12 — Two men were sentenced to 14 days in jail each and fined RM8,000 by the Kuantan Magistrates’ Court after pleading guilty to forging 40 sick leave certificates between March and July last year. Magistrate Ellyna Othman also ordered Mohd Shukrie Zainuddin, 28, and Muhammad Asyraf Zunaidy, 31, to serve an additional eight months in prison if they fail to pay the fine.
The pair were charged under Section 465 of the Penal Code, read together with Section 34 of the same law, which carries a maximum penalty of up to two years’ imprisonment, a fine, or both, upon conviction.
They were accused of dishonestly creating fake sick leave certificates from a clinic and using the name and signature of a licensed doctor to deceive their employer at a factory in Jalan Pintasan Gebeng between March 28 and July 13.
Deputy Public Prosecutor B. Deevagaran Naidu had sought a commensurate sentence, arguing that the accused had abused the trust placed in medical documentation by using a legitimate clinic and doctor’s name to issue false certificates. Defence counsel Muhammad Hakimie Ali from the National Legal Aid Foundation (YBGK) had pleaded for leniency, citing the defendants’ remorse and assurances that they would not repeat the offence, requesting only a fine.
The case highlights ongoing concerns over the misuse of medical documentation in Malaysia, particularly in industrial settings where absenteeism can disrupt operations. Employers often rely on sick leave certificates to manage workforce attendance, and the falsification of such documents undermines workplace integrity and productivity.
In Malaysia, the forgery of official documents, including medical certificates, is a criminal offence that can have serious legal consequences. Under the Penal Code, individuals found guilty of document forgery face imprisonment, fines, or both, depending on the severity of the offence. The court’s decision reflects the judiciary’s stance on deterring such misconduct, especially when it involves the misuse of professional credentials.
The case also raises broader questions about workplace compliance and the need for stricter verification processes for medical certificates. Employers may need to implement additional safeguards, such as direct verification with healthcare providers, to prevent similar incidents. The Malaysian government has previously emphasized the importance of integrity in public and private sector dealings, and this ruling serves as a reminder of the legal risks associated with document fraud.
Moving forward, the enforcement of existing laws and the adoption of preventive measures by employers could help mitigate the occurrence of such offences. The court’s ruling underscores the legal and operational consequences of document forgery, reinforcing the need for vigilance in maintaining the authenticity of official records.